Thinking
Papers in one column, essays in the other.
Everything I've written since I was nineteen has been one long question: what is the difference between technology that connects people and technology that imitates connection? — the throughline
Thinking
Everything I've written since I was nineteen has been one long question: what is the difference between technology that connects people and technology that imitates connection? — the throughline
Four years across UC Santa Cruz and Google Research — first on the ethics of algorithmic media, then on whether large language models can be safely useful inside health and well-being contexts. The throughline has been the same the whole time.
AI systems trained on user-approval signals produce warm, validating responses that provide short-term relief while eroding the user's capacity for self-directed emotional processing. This paper introduces internal authority as a primary design criterion for AI coaching systems and presents a five-move design framework grounded in evidence from a working coaching cohort (N=18, Spring 2026). Drafting now; planning a CHI 2025 submission.
↳ Read the draft on GitHub Code, benchmark, and fine-tuned model on /build
The neurobiological disease model of addiction fails to explain three empirical anomalies: high rates of natural recovery, the graded dose-response between relational trauma and addiction risk, and the dramatic effect of social environment on compulsive use. This review synthesises five evidence streams to argue that addiction is fundamentally a disorder of connection.
Co-authored work from the Google Bangalore food-app vision team. Studies how vision-model errors translate into usable nutrition signals in low-resource consumer apps.
First-author submission from a year-long Google Research project on whether LLMs can be designed to coach users toward well-being without creating dependency. Mixed-methods study with the Fitbit team.
The research instrument I built at CAVEAT to surface algorithmic bias and echo-chamber dynamics on Twitter. Used in the center's first round of empirical studies.
The benchmarks, datasets, and code behind these papers live on /build.
Long-form, slowly. Research has a voice. Coaching has another voice. Neither of them is mine when I'm being honest. The essays are where I try the third one.
New essays land on Substack first and sync here on the next build. Nothing showing right now — check back, or read directly on Substack.